Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Supporting Alternative Energy: Government Uncaps Solar Power Tax Credit
The Perils of Efficiency
Thursday, November 20, 2008
President-elect Obama promises “new chapter” on climate change
Time to Repower America
By Margie Alt, Environment America Executive Director
America's Unhealthiest City
(from Mother Jones)
The CDC recently ranked Huntington, West Virginia as America's unhealthiest city, leading the nation in rates of obesity, heart disease, diabetes—even the percentage of elderly people who have lost all their teeth.
In interviews with the Associated Press, a number of Huntington residents said they didn't have the time, the resources, or the inclination to prioritize personal health.
But Keri Kennedy, a state health officer, says the bigger problem is one of perception.
Poor people think they can't afford to buy healthy food, a belief encouraged by fast-food advertising campaigns. She explains:
She had just seen a commercial that presented "The KFC $10 Challenge." The fried-chicken chain placed a family in a grocery store and challenged them to put together a dinner for $10 or less that was comparable to KFC's seven-piece, $9.99 value meal."This is what we're up against," said Kennedy, noting it's an extremely persuasive ad for a low-income family that is accustomed to fried foods. "I don't know what you do to counter that."
KFC isn't the only fast food chain to capitalize on the belief that low-income people can't afford to eat better. But while there is a correlation between poverty and poor health, there doesn't have to be. Studies have shown that, given the opportunity and encouragement, low-income families will purchase and eat fruits and vegetables. And the rise of community gardens and farmers' markets, even in rural and low-income areas, suggests that a taste for fresh food crosses class lines. Given the right information—in a sense, permission to eat well—the citizens of Huntington could be thriving like their neighbors to the north, on their own terms.
USDA Rushing Through Dangerous New Rules on GE and Pharmaceutical Crops
The USDA has released a proposed rule that would significantly weaken oversight of all genetically engineered crops, and which will continue to allow companies to grow food crops engineered to produce drugs and industrial chemicals.
The proposed rules could also allow companies to grow untested GE crops with no oversight whatsoever: “Over time, the range of GE organisms subject to oversight is expected to decrease...,” a move which USDA itself admits will make contamination of conventional/organic crops with untested GE material more likely.
To add insult to injury, USDA has proposed to write into law its “Low Level Presence” policy, which excuses it from taking any action to remove untested GE crops from conventional or organic food, feed and seed. This contamination often occurs through cross-pollination or seed dispersal, and has cost farmers hundreds of millions of dollars in lost sales and lowered profits.